RE: [Quickfix-users] delegating persistence handling to application
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: Steve B. <st...@xp...> - 2005-02-27 23:19:17
|
Hi Nick, An initial version of a pure Java QuickFIX will be committed to CVS soon. It has a JDBC file store and file log implementation that should work with almost any JDBC-supported DBMS and should also work with the QuickFIX/JNI implementation. HTH, Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Evgeniev [mailto:ni...@de...] > Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 4:51 PM > To: Oren Miller > Cc: qui...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] delegating persistence handling to > application > > > QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX FAQ: http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > > Hi, > > oops, I missed this feature.... Thank you :) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Oren Miller" <or...@qu...> > To: "Nick Evgeniev" <ni...@de...> > Cc: <qui...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 8:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] delegating persistence handling to application > > > > You can already do this. The MessageStoreFactory and MessageStore are > > both regular java interfaces. You can implement them however you like > > and pass your new implementation into the Acceptor/Initiator just like > > the File and MySQL implementations that come with QuickFIX. > > > > --oren > > > > On Feb 27, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Nick Evgeniev wrote: > > > > > QuickFIX Documentation: > > > http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > > > QuickFIX FAQ: > > > http://www.quickfixengine.org/wikifix/index.php?QuickFixFAQ > > > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think it would be nice to have persistence handling delegating from > > > quickfix core to application level, because it would be quite natural > > > to > > > have persistence in java to be implemented via jdbc to ha-oracle or > > > something like that (I can even say oracle advanced queuing). > > > > > > The current implementation (while it's quite robust) limits > > > persistence to > > > plain file and mysql only > > > > > > What the others are thinking about this? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real > > > users. > > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > > Qui...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > |