Re: [Quickfix-developers] Question on Framework in Linux / Windows

[<Eri...@we...>]

Would this apply to NAT addresses to the ECN as well?  Hmm....we actually end up getting a "IOCOnnection" closed because something gets messed up between the two.....

I set the "SocketSynchronousWrites" property to put it in " synchronous mode".  



Eric Hatley

-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph John [mailto:chr...@ma...] 
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 18:49
To: Hatley, Eric A.; qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Question on Framework in Linux / Windows

Hi,
we are running a lot of QFJ sessions on Linux and it works without hassles. However, QFJ does not currently support using proxies for Initiator connections ( http://www.quickfixj.org/jira/browse/QFJ-285 ). Maybe that explains the issues you are seeing.
Moreover, you can still send messages to the FIX session when disconnected. This will increase your sequence number and the missed messages should be requested to be resent on the next connection establishment.
What do you mean by "synchronous mode"?
Best regards,
Chris



Eri...@we... schrieb:

>QuickFIX Documentation:
>http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>My team is evaluating this software as a possible solution to become a 
>FIX client to an ECN.  The framework was somewhat easy to work with and 
>straightforward to use, but we are hitting a major roadblock.
>
>The Quickfix/j framework is reporting that it is sending messages to 
>the ECN, and we do see some messages getting through (we see offers on 
>their site we sent) but after a period of time, the framework seems to 
>lose its ability to send messages (not sure if the acceptor is not 
>releasing our initiator) on Linux.  We are trying to replicate the 
>issue in windows, but so far no luck.  Even though it doesn't appear to 
>lose the ability to receive messages (we can see that we get a Test 
>Message requesting a heartbeat) and ultimately the acceptor closes the 
>connection
>
>Are there any known issues (I haven't found any searching the archives) 
>with running MINA on Linux?
>
>We have tried:
>*       Running to  a local FIX Acceptor (no issues) in Linux. (Pass)
>*       Running a proxy on windows and relaying to the ECN (Failure)
>*       Running to a proxy on another Linux machine (Failure)
>*       Running high speed on windows to an ECN (looks like it passed)
>*       Running from windows to a proxy on Linux (looks like it failed)
>- not sure of pass / fail on this one.
>*       Adjusting the majority of the session parameters.
>*       Just letting heart beating go between in Linux (Pass)
>*       Running in synchronous mode in Linux (Failure)
>
>Any ideas would be appreciated.....and is it possible the acceptor 
>could stop our initiator from sending?
>
>
>
>
>Eric Hatley
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>This email is subject to a disclaimer, please click on the following 
>link or cut and paste the link into the address bar of your browser.
>
>https://www.wellsfargo.com/com/disclaimer/ged2
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>------- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud 
>computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also 
>focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
>http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/_______________________
>________________________
>Quickfix-developers mailing list
>Qui...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers