Re: [Quickfix-developers] Conditionally Required Field Missing (35)

[Marco N. <sg...@ya...>]

Oren, thanks for the hint, i will look into it as soon as i get back
to work (i'm ill @ home right now). Sorry for having posted on the wrong mailing list. It should have been quickfixJ from the beginning. 

For the time being i got around this brutally hacking the source of quickfixj (my app is not meant to be a production ready system so, i could afford it), still i want to understand what's going on. 

Thanks again and sorry for posting to the wrong list.

Marco

--- Gio 10/6/10, or...@qu... <or...@qu...> ha scritto:

> Da: or...@qu... <or...@qu...>
> Oggetto: RE: [Quickfix-developers] Conditionally Required Field Missing (35)
> A: "Marco Nicolini" <sg...@ya...>
> Cc: qui...@li...
> Data: Giovedì 10 giugno 2010, 15:15
> Marco,
> 
> Does this happen even if your fromApp method is
> empty?  I'm trying to
> determine if the engine itself is causing a problem or your
> code.  Also
> you might want to post this to thie quickfixj mailing list
> if you
> haven't already.
> 
> --oren
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Conditionally Required
> Field Missing
> > (35)
> > From: Marco Nicolini <sg...@ya...>
> > Date: Tue, June 08, 2010 12:39 pm
> > To: qui...@li...
> > 
> > 
> > QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> > 
> > Hello, 
> > I'm developing a quick app to do some testing, and
> i've found out that quickfixj sends a business reject
> message with no apparent (at least to me) reason:
> > 
> > After my app sends a request for quote, the system i'm
> testing against sends a 35=b and a 35=S (quote) messages:
> > 
> >
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=325#35=b#34=109#49=RCBVIE#52=20100608-17:05:06.305#56=CATSOS#122=20100608-17:05:06.305#128=2123#129=catsos#145=RCBVIE#131=12760167506290#117=12760167506290#297=100#296=1#302=1#311=XXX#304=1#295=1#299=1#55=catsos#48=DE000HV5BU04#22=4#167=OPT#200=201102#205=24#201=1#202=75.000000#206=S#231=10.000000#107=this
> and that#10=003#
> > 
> >
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=325#35=S#34=110#49=RCBVIE#52=20100608-17:05:06.309#56=CATSOS#122=20100608-17:05:06.309#128=2123#129=catsos#145=RCBVIE#22=4#48=DE000HV5BU04#55=catsos#107=this
> and
> that#117=12760167506290#131=12760167506290#132=100.000000#133=101.000000#134=200#135=200#167=OPT#200=201102#201=1#202=75.000000#205=24#206=S#231=10.000000#10=165#
> > 
> > And those are the rejects sent out by quickfixj:
> >
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=120#35=j#34=80#49=CATSOS#52=20100608-17:06:54.472#56=RCBVIE#45=109#58=Conditionally
> Required Field Missing (35)#372=b#380=5#10=194#
> > 
> >
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=120#35=j#34=81#49=CATSOS#52=20100608-17:06:54.472#56=RCBVIE#45=110#58=Conditionally
> Required Field Missing (35)#372=S#380=5#10=172#
> > 
> > I don't receive the messages in the fromApp method and
> reviewing the source of Session.java i see that 35 (the
> number appended to the reject reason) is really the field
> quickfix think to be missing (which i do believe instead to
> be it's present see the dump above).
> > 
> > I'm using the following config regarding validation:
> >   DataDictionary=FIX42.xml
> >   UseDataDictionary=Y
> >   ValidateUserDefinedFields=N
> >   AllowUnknownMsgFields=Y
> >   CheckLatency=N
> >   ValidateFieldsOutOfOrder=N
> > 
> > but trying with UseDataDictionary=N has no effect
> whatsoever. 
> > Anyone has an idea of what might be going on? 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Marcello
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >       
> > 
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> 
> > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to
> the 
> > lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and
> enter to win: 
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> > _______________________________________________
> > Quickfix-developers mailing list
> > Qui...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
> 
>