Re: [Quickfix-developers] Conditionally Required Field Missing (35)

[<or...@qu...>]

Marco,

Does this happen even if your fromApp method is empty?  I'm trying to
determine if the engine itself is causing a problem or your code.  Also
you might want to post this to thie quickfixj mailing list if you
haven't already.

--oren

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Quickfix-developers] Conditionally Required Field Missing
> (35)
> From: Marco Nicolini <sg...@ya...>
> Date: Tue, June 08, 2010 12:39 pm
> To: qui...@li...
> 
> 
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> 
> Hello, 
> I'm developing a quick app to do some testing, and i've found out that quickfixj sends a business reject message with no apparent (at least to me) reason:
> 
> After my app sends a request for quote, the system i'm testing against sends a 35=b and a 35=S (quote) messages:
> 
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=325#35=b#34=109#49=RCBVIE#52=20100608-17:05:06.305#56=CATSOS#122=20100608-17:05:06.305#128=2123#129=catsos#145=RCBVIE#131=12760167506290#117=12760167506290#297=100#296=1#302=1#311=XXX#304=1#295=1#299=1#55=catsos#48=DE000HV5BU04#22=4#167=OPT#200=201102#205=24#201=1#202=75.000000#206=S#231=10.000000#107=this and that#10=003#
> 
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=325#35=S#34=110#49=RCBVIE#52=20100608-17:05:06.309#56=CATSOS#122=20100608-17:05:06.309#128=2123#129=catsos#145=RCBVIE#22=4#48=DE000HV5BU04#55=catsos#107=this and that#117=12760167506290#131=12760167506290#132=100.000000#133=101.000000#134=200#135=200#167=OPT#200=201102#201=1#202=75.000000#205=24#206=S#231=10.000000#10=165#
> 
> And those are the rejects sent out by quickfixj:
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=120#35=j#34=80#49=CATSOS#52=20100608-17:06:54.472#56=RCBVIE#45=109#58=Conditionally Required Field Missing (35)#372=b#380=5#10=194#
> 
> 8=FIX.4.2#9=120#35=j#34=81#49=CATSOS#52=20100608-17:06:54.472#56=RCBVIE#45=110#58=Conditionally Required Field Missing (35)#372=S#380=5#10=172#
> 
> I don't receive the messages in the fromApp method and reviewing the source of Session.java i see that 35 (the number appended to the reject reason) is really the field quickfix think to be missing (which i do believe instead to be it's present see the dump above).
> 
> I'm using the following config regarding validation:
>   DataDictionary=FIX42.xml
>   UseDataDictionary=Y
>   ValidateUserDefinedFields=N
>   AllowUnknownMsgFields=Y
>   CheckLatency=N
>   ValidateFieldsOutOfOrder=N
> 
> but trying with UseDataDictionary=N has no effect whatsoever. 
> Anyone has an idea of what might be going on? 
> 
> Regards,
> Marcello
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers