Re: [Quickfix-users] ValidateUserDefinedFields=N doesn't work in the [DEFAULT] Section Of a settings file in Quickfix 1.13.2

[ka w. <ka...@gm...>]

I have the same config (.Net 3.5) and I also have some custom tags.
Upgrading to the new version didn't change anything, it works well!

K.

2010/3/26 Sev Zaslavsky <se...@gm...>

> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> The only thing I replaced was the Dll file references.  The user-defined
> field was never defined in our dictionary file.  Note that Francis
> Gingras confirmed something similar.
>
> Oren Miller wrote:
> > Hmmm.  Doesn't look like the implementation has changed.  And the
> > document does say ValidateUserDefinedFields defaults to true.  Are you
> > sure that you did not replace the data dictionary file with one not
> > containing those fields?
> >
> > On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:19, sevzas <se...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> >> QuickFIX Documentation:
> >> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> >> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm upgrading Quickfix from 1.12.4 to 1.13.2.  I use QuickFix with a
> >> .NET 3.5
> >> app.
> >>
> >> I took existing code that works and simply changed the references
> >> point to
> >> the new QuickFix 1.13.2.
> >>
> >> What I'm seeing is that messages with custom tags are now being
> >> rejected by
> >> my app.
> >>
> >> I get messages like (tags 49 and 56 are changed)
> >> 8=FIX.4.2 9=119 35=3 34=239 49=XXXX 50=0001 52=20100326-13:56:00.406
> 56=XXXX 57=TEST 45=240 58=Invalid
> >>
> >> tag number 371=9621 372=8 373=0 10=144
> >>
> >> This message is a rejection of tag 9621 which is a custom tag sent by an
> >> ECN.  I would like custom fields to be accepted by my app like they were
> >> with the old version of QuickFix.
> >>
> >> My config file is built from pieces by my code, but looks like this
> >> before
> >> creating a session (some parms are changed):
> >>
> >> [DEFAULT]
> >> ConnectionType=initiator
> >> BeginString=FIX.4.2
> >> CheckCompID=N
> >> CheckLatency=N
> >> StartTime=00:00:00
> >> EndTime=00:00:00
> >> HeartBtInt=5
> >> MaxLatency=120
> >> ReconnectInterval=1
> >> UseDataDictionary=Y
> >> ValidateFieldsHaveValues=N
> >> ValidateFieldsOutOfOrder=N
> >> ValidateUserDefinedFields=N
> >> SocketNoDelay=Y
> >> PersistMessages=Y
> >> [SESSION]
> >> DataDictionary=FIX42.xml
> >> SenderCompID=BD
> >> SenderSubID=0001
> >> SocketConnectHost=111.22.33.44
> >> SocketConnectPort=12345
> >> TargetCompID=ECN
> >> TargetSubID=TEST
> >>
> >> When I move the "ValidateUserDefinedFields=N" to the [SESSION]
> >> section, it
> >> seems to work fine.  So there is a work-around but it requires a
> >> change.  I
> >> also fear that some of the other ValidateXXXXX settings do not work
> >> properly
> >> in the [SESSION] section.
> >>
> >> Can anyone out there confirm the problem and does anyone know an ETA
> >> for a
> >> fix?
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/ValidateUserDefinedFields%3DN-doesn%27t-work-in-the--DEFAULT--Section-Of-a-settings-file-in-Quickfix-1.13.2-tp28043059p28043059.html
> >>
> >> Sent from the QuickFIX - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Quickfix-users mailing list
> >> Qui...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
> >>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>