Re: [Quickfix-developers] bugs, bug tracking, and release plans

[Andrew C. <And...@Tw...>]

Some thoughts.

1. Latest integration of bug fixes into primary build
2. Little stuff that seems to be on the list frequently (rolling log files,
encryption support)
3. Support for latest FIX releases (FastFIX, FIX5.0)

Andrew Culross
Direct   +1 (914) 220-8849 
http://www.twofour.com/emaildisclaimer.aspx

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Remes [mailto:cre...@ma...] 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:09 PM
To: or...@qu...
Cc: And...@Tw...; 'quickfix developers'; 'Mark T. Kennedy'
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] bugs, bug tracking, and release plans


On Mar 6, 2009, at 12:47 PM, or...@qu... wrote:

> Hold on guys.  We are still alive over here.  I know that's it's  
> been a
> while and I've neglected things for a bit.  I really would like to  
> avoid
> a fork, that would be messy.  I think we need to talk about what the
> core issues that need to be addressed with the project and move  
> forward
> from there.
>
> --oren

Oren,

I'll take a first stab at listing a few things that I think are  
important to this list. Hopefully others will chime in.

1. A release that builds cleanly under 64-bit OS.

2. A release that builds cleanly on Debian, FreeBSD and OSX. These  
build issues *may* be related to gcc 4.3.x. Past emails to this list  
indicate there may have been patches submitted for these issues.

3. Some members of this list may deserve commit rights. A move from  
svn to git may streamline this a bit if you prefer to avoid giving  
"strangers" commit rights to the svn repository. With git, everyone's  
local repository is effectively a fork that can submit patches upstream.

cr