Re: [Quickfix-developers] Missing SecurityType

[<or...@qu...>]

Yeah, this is right.  Looks like we should be aggregating these values
when generating the code.  If we do this with fields too we can generate
the deprecated fields instead of maintaining that list by hand.

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Missing SecurityType
> From: Mike Gatny <mg...@co...>
> Date: Mon, May 05, 2008 12:22 pm
> To: qui...@li...
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> I did a quick check (find src/C++/ -name "*.h" | xargs egrep -H 
> 'MUNI|GOVT|FHA|ZOO') and it looks like the values Wareen mentions really 
> aren't there.   For standard quickfix, should they be defined in 
> DeprecatedValues.h?
> -- 
> Mike Gatny
> Connamara Systems, LLC
> http://www.connamara.com/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers