Re: [Quickfix-developers] FIX Query
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2008-02-19 18:13:55
|
An execution report will probably be best since it gives back the order ID. It makes it easier for the sender to identify the order that is being rejected. There is no need to disconnect a user just because of a session level reject. --oren On Feb 18, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Parag Trivedi wrote: > QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/ > html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > > Hello, > I have following queries. > 1) For new single order request, for example, if I say I will > support value 1 & 2 for OrderType field and supposing couterparty > sends value 3 in request should I generate session-level reject? If > No, then should I forward the request with invalid value to trading > exchange and allow > exchange to send rejection(execution report)? > 2) If I reject any message at session-level after sending session > level reject, should I disconnect the sender? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-developers mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers |