[Quickfix-developers] ThreadedSocketInitiator/ SynchronizedApplication vs SocketInitiator/ Synchron
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: Naveed A. <na...@nc...> - 2007-08-15 13:42:16
|
Hello All, I am using an initiator (ThreadedSocketInitiator/Application) to connect to an Acceptor (ThreadedSocketAcceptor/Application). This acceptor accepts connection from various initiators. The initiator just connects to this acceptor. What can be a better alternate if any in terms of the application architecture is concerned... For the Initiator 1. Should I use ThreadedSocketInitiator and SynchronizedApplication..? 2. Should I use SocketInitiator and SynchronizedApplication..? 3. Should I use SocketInitiator and Application..? 4. Should I use ThreadedSocketInitiator and Application..? For the Acceptor 1. Should I use ThreadedSocketAcceptor and SynchronizedApplication..? 2. Should I use SocketAcceptor and SynchronizedApplication..? 3. Should I use SocketAcceptor and Application..? 4. Should I use ThreadedSocketAcceptor and Application..? Thanks in Advance -Naveed |