Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Thanks Toby.

 

We are going to use QuickFix or QuckFix on some performance critical
application. Currently we use Quickfix via JNI wrapper. 

 

BR,

 

Eranga

 

  _____  

From: Shepheard, Toby (London) [mailto:Tob...@ml...] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:23 PM
To: Eranga Samararathna; qui...@li...
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

 

I can't help you with the benchmarking as I've not done this, but you'd need
to consider whether you're comparing the straight C++ version of QuickFix,
or QuickFix via one of the wrappers (eg JNI). I'd also take ease of
development/support into consideration as well as performance.

 

We do use QFJ in a production environment, and I've had no problems with it
at all. I should caveat that, as it's not running in a performance-critical
environment and it's under a very light load, but for our purposes it's been
ideal and I've not heard any suggestions that it can't handle much higher
loads. As always you should of course test for yourself as everybody's
environment differs.

 

Rgds,

Toby

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
Eranga Samararathna
Sent: 05 September 2006 05:05
To: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFix vs QuickFix/j .......

Hi,

 

Is any one bench mark the QuickFix vs QuickFix/j? How is the performance
difference of these two systems? 

Are there any organizations use QuickFix/ j for their production systems? 

 

 

BR,

 

Eranga

  _____  

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain
or redistribute it. Click here  <http://www.ml.com/email_terms/> for
important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
http://www.ml.com/email_terms/

  _____