Re: [Quickfix-developers] QFJ:The problems in definite a new protocolof FIX subset.
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: Lin L. <le...@gm...> - 2006-07-03 14:29:34
|
Hi Steve, Appreciate! I looked the session implementation of QFJ and found some codes depend on ther FIX vesion.e.g.Session.java,Message.java,DataDictionary.java. Most of the FIX version codes are in the private methods.If the Session is a abstract class,the class extends from Session class will overload the methods related to FIX version. Then I can definite "MYFIX" protocol special behavior.Actually,"MYFIX" protocol has same behavior with FIX4.4,except for specail begin string "MYFIX" .But also "MYFIX" protocol has new field types and message types. Do you think it make sense? Regards, Lejiang On 7/3/06, Steve Bate <sb...@sm...> wrote: > > Hello Lejiang, > > The other issue to consider is that the Session protocol > implementation has some behavior which varies according > to the FIX version. Using a nonstandard begin string might > lead to some unexpected behavior. Look for reerences to > the FIX version constants to see where the behavior is > customized. > > Regards, > > Steve > -- Lin Lejiang |