Re: [Quickfix-developers] SeqNum not incrementing

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

I don't think there is any problem sending this whenever you want.   
If their acceptor is always sending a reset on a sequence number of  
1, than the initiator probably should as well.  Otherwise If it  
doesn't, I think the behavior would have to work as follows.

Initiator: Sends Logon Without ResetSeqNumFlag
Acceptor: Respond With Logon With ResetSeqNumFlag
Initiator: Respond With Logon With ResetSeqNumFlag

But, that doesn't seem like it would even work in this case, because  
after they send an unsolicited reset, they are still expecting  
sequence number 2, when I would expect it would be 1 and the reject  
would be due to receiving another message when a logon is expected.   
It is possible they would respond entirely differently to a logon  
message however, so who knows.

Any information that the counter-party can provide about this  
behavior would be most helpful.

--oren

On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Dave Linaker wrote:

> It seems odd to me that they are responding to your normal logon  
> with a
> reset logon. Is this allowed?
>
> Perhaps someone else has a bit more experience with 24 hour sessions?
>
> cheers
> Dave
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>