Re: [Quickfix-developers] sockets question: to block or not to block?

[Sean K. <sea...@pi...>]

In light of this information, I am considering spending the time to =
evaluate the ThreadedSocketAcceptor to prevent a single trouble-maker =
from affecting our other sessions.  I seem to recall there being some =
issues discussed previously on the list regarding the way the threads =
are attached / detached.  Does anyone have any positive or negative =
experiences they could share using the threaded acceptor?  Outstanding =
issues?  I would also like to know if there are any benchmarks in terms =
of # of sessions successfully supported and under what kind of load?

Thanks,
--Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 6:28 PM
To: Sean Kirkpatrick
Cc: qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] sockets question: to block or not to
block?


They are blocking.

--oren

On Jun 15, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Sean Kirkpatrick wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/=20
> html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> I apologize for the resend, but figured plain text is more =20
> acceptable...
>
> Hello All,
>
> Could someone clarify something for me?  Are the sockets created on =20
> the SocketAcceptor (non-threaded) blocking or non-blocking?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>