Re: [Quickfix-developers] linux compilation

[Caleb E. <cal...@gm...>]

On 5/24/06, Igor Seleznev <se...@ma...> wrote:
> For quickfix developers: the problem is that instead of
>
> class Foo
> {
>  int Foo::Foo(void);
> }
>
> it is better to write: class Foo
> {
>   int Foo(void);
> }

Its not that the latter is better.  The former is just plain wrong.
The code only compiled because the compiler (e.g. older versions of
gcc) wasn't strict enough.

A constructor can't return a value anyway, so both forms are wrong :)

--=20
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com