RE: [Quickfix-developers] isCorrectCompID
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: Ajay K. <Aja...@tr...> - 2006-05-10 18:13:31
|
Brian, I also faintly recall hearing second/third-hand that CME uses 0 as a sequence number for all messages on a backup FIX session up until it becomes a primary. Is there any truth to that? - Ajay -----Original Message----- From: Brian Erst [mailto:azz...@ya...]=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:56 PM To: Oren Miller; Jain, Anil; rho; qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] isCorrectCompID QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Oren - Just to make you aware, CME really does violence to the whole SenderCompID tag. When they created their new FIX gateway a few years back, they removed just about all the routing intelligence that had been built into the old one. Due to this fact, they ended up needing a field that would allow both the failover routing (that whole "U" versus "P" thing) as well as multi-clearing firm support (for instance, one of my clients clears under 5-6 different clearing firm numbers due to a number of acquisitions over the years).=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- The information in this email is confidential and may be legally = privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone = else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, = copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on = it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. TradeWeb reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all = messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail = address may be stored on the TradeWeb e-mail system. |