[Quickfix-developers] RE: QuickFIX for Python
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: Shawn Y. <sya...@ge...> - 2006-04-07 19:28:28
|
Sounds good to me, thanks. This exchange (CME) is touchy so I'm glad = you found a good solution. Shawn Yarbrough Senior E-Trading Developer Gelber Group, LLC sya...@ge... THE MESSAGES AND DOCUMENTS TRANSMITTED WITH THIS NOTICE CONTAIN = CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION BELONGING TO THE SENDER. IF YOU ARE NOT THE = INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATION, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY = DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION IS STRICTLY = PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE = NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY. -----Original Message----- From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:08 PM To: Shawn Yarbrough Cc: qui...@li... Subject: Re: QuickFIX for Python I checked in a fix that makes sure the SendingTime and =20 OrigSendingTime will match for SequenceReset messages. The resend =20 functionality is different because there the timestamps can and =20 should be different, but for SequenceResets, the message is being =20 sent for the first time. The only reason there is an OrigSendingTime =20 in the message is that it must accompany and message containing a =20 PossDup field. And the only reason it has a PossDup field is because =20 any message sent as a result of a resend request must contain a =20 PossDup field, even if the message was never sent before. So it is a =20 bit of an anomoly. --oren |