Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFixJ: Problem with message length calculation when the recei ved mess
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
|
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2006-04-04 14:28:28
|
The changes are mostly related to using user defined fields for what would otherwise be the standard BeginString, Length fields and such. This is because the Canonical format uses their own fields for these instead of the standard fix ones. So the issues with Canonical show up when you want to parse or insert a value into the data field. There are also issues with generating the wrapper classes since the BeginString is Canonical.1.00 instead of the normal FIX.x.x. (BTW they make extensive use of Groups, so two data dictionaries are required, on for the FIX wrapper, and one for the Canonical messages). I'll put together details on the specifics of what was done to support Canonical messages. --oren On Apr 4, 2006, at 4:44 AM, Steve Bate wrote: > From: qui...@li... > [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf > Of Oren Miller > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:38 PM > To: Parhami, Faraz; qui...@li...; quickfix- > dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFixJ: Problem with message > length calculation when the recei ved message contains a set of > field/values pairs in the raw data field wh ich is tag '96' |