Re: [Quickfix-developers] Weirdness in the .NET Wrapper?

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

The wrapper is not generated, it is written by hand, which is why not =20=

everything is perfect.  The wrapper was put together before SWIG =20
really had significant support for .NET.  We may look at moving to =20
SWIG for the java and .NET wrappers at some point in the future.  We =20
do use SWIG for the python API.

--oren

On Jan 16, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Andrei Goldchleger wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/=20
> html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hi there,
>
> Can anyone explain why there isn't a direct correspondence between
> some C++ classes and their .NET wrappers? For example, consider the
> FieldMap, Group, and Message classes (CVS head). In the native code,
> both Group and Message inherit from FieldMap. However, in their .NET
> versions only Message inherits from FieldMap. Another one: a lot of
> methods available in the C++ version of FieldMap seem to be missing
> from its .NET counterpart.
>
> So is this intentional or it is a flaw in the wrapper generation?
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrei
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through =20
> log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD =20
> SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>