Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX/J mystery....

[Tom D. <to...@di...>]

Hi, Toby...

I'm using "almost the latest" -- checked it out of CVS in early 
November...  

Tom...



Shepheard, Toby (London) wrote:
> What version are you using? You might want to try the latest code from
> CVS if you're not already, as there have been some changes maade since
> the last beta release. No promises that it holds a fix, but there were
> some changes around the connectivity and session code.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: qui...@li...
> [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
> Tom Dilatush
> Sent: 16 December 2005 21:31
> To: QuickFIX Developers
> Subject: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX/J mystery....
>
>
> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hi, folks...
>
> Any insight into this strangeness would be very welcome...
>
> I have a QuickFIX/J application that is working, but only when I put 
> some baling wire and chewing gum (a hack) into it.  This application has
>
> a single initiator session, and I've used ThreadedSocketInitiator.  
> Without the hack, on startup the following sequence occurs (via network 
> sniffer):
> -- a TCP connection is established
> -- the TCP connection is taken down (and the debug log shows a 
> "responder: disconnect" event).  The takedown is initiated by my 
> application's side of the connection.
> -- the above two sequences are repeated, exactly
> -- a TCP connection is established for the third time, stays 
> established, but then nothing else happens.  Even a logon() call has no 
> effect.
>
> If I run the same exact code with a debugger (I'm using IntelliJ Idea), 
> and if I single-step over the call to initiator.start(), and if I have 
> other threads suspended while single-stepping (all three conditions are 
> necessary), then everything works just like you'd expect -- the 
> connection at the TCP level is established on the first try, and the 
> logon proceeds normally. 
>
> While putzing around trying to imagine what the heck this could be, I 
> discovered the hack: if I insert a delay (a sleep()) of 350 milliseconds
>
> or greater in the onCreate(SessionID) method of my Application, then 
> everything works great, first time, every time.
>
> Does this ring a bell with anyone?
>
> BTW, I'm a newbie on QuickFIX/J, so don't dismiss any bozo maneuvers by 
> saying to yourself "Nah, nobody could be that stupid!"  Because yes I
> could.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom...
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
> --------------------------------------------------------
>