Re: [Quickfix-developers] Verbose logging/debugging

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

I ran it through and didn't see any problems.  Since the message has 
been changed, I cannot verify that the length and checksum fields were 
calculated correctly however.  Is it possible for you to run the system 
through a debugger?

--oren

James Wiggs wrote:

>QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> Hello Dave,
>
>   Currently I am using the default settings for CheckLatency.
>The incoming/outgoing message logs show the machine's clocks to
>be within 1 second of each other.
>
>   I am using a data dictionary, but I have not added all of the
>counterparty's user-defined fields to it yet, and in fact there
>are two fields that were included in the Logon message that they
>sent which are not in their current documentation.  However, I
>have ValidateUserDefinedFields set to N.
>
>   In reply to Oren's comments in a separate note: according to
>the counterparty's logfiles, *my* end is the one dropping the
>connection, not theirs.  I'm trying to figure out how to get QF
>to tell me precisely *why* it is dropping the connection.  Here
>is the content of the event file:
>
>20051209-02:48:30 : Created session
>20051209-02:48:30 : Connecting to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX on port XXXXX
>20051209-02:48:30 : Connection succeeded
>20051209-02:48:30 : Initiated logon request
>20051209-02:48:31 : Dropped Connection
>
>Here is the logon message I send out (substituting | for SOH):
>
>8=FIX.4.2|9=65|35=A|34=1|49=OurCompID|52=20051209-02:48:30.946|56=TheirCompID|98=0|108=30|10=121|
>
>Here is what I get back:
>
>8=FIX.4.2|9=0088|35=A|34=000001|43=N|52=20051209-02:48:31|49=TheirCompID|56=OurCompID|98=0|108=30|6179=0|6247=prod|10=252|
>
>   Within a second of receiving this, QuickFIX apparently closes
>the connection.  Their logfiles show no session-level message to
>say what the gripe was, and my logfiles don't tell me either.  I
>thought it might have something to do with tags 6179 and 6247
>but as I've said, I have validation on user defined fields turned
>off; Oren says it applies to both application and administrative,
>and I trust him on that.  BTW, we are working off QuickFIX 1.9.4
>right now.  We have not upgraded to the latest, and have no plan
>to do so until early next year unless it is absolutely necessary.
>Too many other irons in the fire right now.
>
>thanks,
>Jim
>
>  
>
>>Hi Jim,
>>
>>A couple of questions?
>>
>>Have you got CheckLatency set?  ...and is there a difference in the
>>clocks between the two machines running the FIX engines?
>>
>>Are you using a DataDictionary?
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Dave
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Quickfix-developers mailing list
>Qui...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>
>
>  
>