RE: [Quickfix-developers] [qfj] Publishing Messages to JMS

[Steve B. <st...@te...>]

> Brad Harvey wrote:
> I've added the bug reports as requested. Would you prefer that "obvious"
> ones go straight to the bug tracker in future?  Are there guidelines on
> the severity and priorities to use?

Hi Brad,

Thanks. If the bugs don't need any discussion on the list
then it's probably a good idea to go ahead and enter them into the
bug tracker. Maybe Oren can comment on the severity/priority
guidelines. I'd recommend just leaving those at the defaults and
we can adjust them after reviewing the bug.
 
> > I see the Field, FieldMap, and the FieldOrderComparator inner class
> > are missing serialVersionUIDs. I'll add those. Were there other
> classes
> > that were causing you problems?
> 
> There are quite a few - the javadoc/serialized-form.html page will show
> them (the ones that are ok list the serialVersionUID, the ones that
> aren't don't), or you can configure eclipse to show a warning for them.
> Many of the generated classes have inner classes that don't define it.

OK, I was only looking at classes that directly implement the Serializable
interface. I'll talk with the other developers about how to clean up the
Serializable usage and be sure we have serial version IDs for all classes
that derive from Serializable classes.
 
> I think my problems were exacerbated by making the DataDictionary
> serializable - all the Field classes were being sent around.

I've made changes in the beta branch in CVS that no longer require
the DataDictionary to be serialized with the message.

Thanks again for the reports.

Steve