Re: [Quickfix-developers] [qfj] Publishing Messages to JMS

[Caleb E. <cal...@gm...>]

On 9/12/05, Steve Bate <st...@te...> wrote:
>=20
> Is the Session::send() operation in C++ never expected to throw
> an exception, even if the connection is down? It appears that


I believe that is the case. Maybe Oren could comment.

it's designed to return a boolean based on a low-level system
> call return value. If so, then we'll need to slightly modify
> the Java code to catch low-level socket-related exceptions and
> return a boolean result value instead of propagating an exception.


Anything that would prevent the persistence from happening would be a Bad=
=20
Thing.

--=20
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com