RE: [Queue-developers] Error running jobs

[Sam L. <sam...@an...>]

Yeah, but queued says the load is less than 1, but queue says the load is
57,200,000,000

I set my pfactor to 100 and maxexec to 20

Sam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: W. G. Krebs [mailto:wer...@ya...]
> Sent: 12 April 2001 01:05
> To: que...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Queue-developers] Error running jobs
> 
> 
> This is correct behavior.
> 
> The load average is divided by vmaxexec minus number of 
> running jobs or
> one, whichever is greater, and then multiplied by p-factor.
> 
> In this case, the load is divided by two.
> 
> This helps to give unused machines a slight leg-up in the competition.
> (p-factor should be set to discourage slow machines from 
> getting jobs.)
> 
> Sam Liddicott wrote:
> 
> > Now I fixed the syntax errors in the profiles, I get:
> >
> > wakeup.c getrldavg(): po.ananova.net returned load 5.72e+10.
> > Queue "now" at host "po.ananova.net" has rldavg of 5.72e+10.
> > The host "po.ananova.net" is not able to serve queue "now".
> > Failed to submit job in queue "now" to host "po.ananova.net".
> >
> > an exceedingly high load.
> >
> > /tmp/queue/queued.debug:
> > po.ananova.net[281]: queued queued.c check_query():
> >         The "now" queue: q_status1:
> >         "now: enabled: maxexec=2 loadsched=25 loadstop=50 nice=0 cpu
> > 71582788 min
> > "
> > po.ananova.net[281]: queued queued.c check_query():
> >         The "now" queue: q_oldstat = -1.
> > po.ananova.net[281]: queued queued.c check_query():
> >         calculating load... avg = 0.160.
> > po.ananova.net[281]: queued queued.c check_query():
> >         calculated load = 0.387.
> > po.ananova.net[281]: queued queued.c check_query():
> >         Queue "now": load average query response:  0.39 
> (0x3ec60000).
> > po.ananova.net[281]: queued queued.c check_query():
> >         Load average 0.160156,  vmaxexec 2,  nexec 0,  pfactor 1.
> > po.ananova.net[281]: queued queued.c check_query():
> >         select()ing on sockets: 6 and 7...
> >
> > Which all looks about right.
> > So how did queue so badly misread the load?
> >
> > Sam
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Queue-developers mailing list Que...@li...
> > To unsubscribe, subscribe, or set options:
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/queue-developers
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Queue-developers mailing list Que...@li...
> To unsubscribe, subscribe, or set options:
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/queue-developers
>