[Queue-developers] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: new intermediate development Queue version

[QingLong <qin...@Bo...>]

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:06:39PM +0100, Gert Van den Eynde wrote:
>
> >   Does it change anything? If it does, then the problem matter is alarms
>
> I'm afraid not:
>
> qlib.c Queue_net_connect(): connect()ing to 192.168.1.1:1423 ...
> qlib.c Queue_net_connect(): connect()ed  to 192.168.1.1:1423 on socket 7.
> wakeup.c getrldavg(): close(7).
> wakeup.c getrldavg(): fermi returned load 1.15e+00.
> qlib.c Queue_net_connect(): connect()ing to 192.168.1.3:1423 ...
> qlib.c Queue_net_connect(): connect()ed  to 192.168.1.3:1423 on socket 7.
> wakeup.c getrldavg(): close(7).
> wakeup.c getrldavg(): bohr returned load 1.08e+00.
> qlib.c Queue_net_connect(): connect()ing to 192.168.1.4:1423 ...
> qlib.c Queue_net_connect(): connect()ed  to 192.168.1.4:1423 on socket 7.
> qlib.c Queue_nonblocking_rw(): failed to select() on fd 7:
> select(): Interrupted system call
> qlib.c Queue_net_rw(): failed to get 1 4-byte items on fd 7; got 0 bytes.
>
   Maybe, maybe.
 Nevertheless I added that workaround I have mentioned in previous message
 as I think that this is right thing to do (here on the not-so-right way).
 Would you be so kind as to give it a try? Maybe that will reveal something
 interesting that will help me to get insight of the problem. Thank you.

      QingLong.