Menu
▾
▴
quantlib-dev
|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@fa...> - 2004-03-16 09:24:19
|
Hi all, I just uploaded tentative tarballs for release 0.3.5 into http://quantlib.org/gm/ Please play with them if your computer has a few spare cycles. Dirk and Liguo: the final tarballs will come later, but can you check that your Debian/RPM thing works correctly? Thanks, Luigi |
|
From: Dirk E. <ed...@de...> - 2004-03-16 13:54:04
|
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Luigi Ballabio wrote: > > Hi all, > I just uploaded tentative tarballs for release 0.3.5 into > http://quantlib.org/gm/ > Please play with them if your computer has a few spare cycles. > > Dirk and Liguo: the final tarballs will come later, but can you check > that your Debian/RPM thing works correctly? It built flawlessly in my pbuilder(8) chroot, and I'll upload it right now version 0.3.4.20040316-1 to Debian. Dirk -- The relationship between the computed price and reality is as yet unknown. -- From the pac(8) manual page |
|
From: Dirk E. <ed...@de...> - 2004-03-24 14:49:08
|
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:53:47AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Luigi Ballabio wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I just uploaded tentative tarballs for release 0.3.5 into > > http://quantlib.org/gm/ > > Please play with them if your computer has a few spare cycles. > > > > Dirk and Liguo: the final tarballs will come later, but can you check > > that your Debian/RPM thing works correctly? > > It built flawlessly in my pbuilder(8) chroot, and I'll upload it right now > version 0.3.4.20040316-1 to Debian. As a follow-up, QuantLib as well as Quantlib-Python and QuantLib-Ruby also built flawlessly on all other architectures and, unless I make a new upload before then, it scheduled to move from Debian 'unstable' to 'testing' in a few days. We don't have a problem with that, do we? Congrats to all for such a smooth pre-release. Dirk -- The relationship between the computed price and reality is as yet unknown. -- From the pac(8) manual page |
|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@fa...> - 2004-03-24 14:53:27
|
On 2004.03.24 15:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > As a follow-up, QuantLib as well as Quantlib-Python and QuantLib-Ruby > also built flawlessly on all other architectures and, unless I make a > new upload before then, it scheduled to move from Debian 'unstable' > to 'testing' in a few days. We don't have a problem with that, do > we? I guess we don't. But then again, you'll make a new upload in a few days :) > Congrats to all for such a smooth pre-release. Thanks, Luigi |
|
From: Liguo S. <lig...@va...> - 2004-03-16 17:39:17
|
Hi, guys, Sorry to be less responsive recently. I just finished my Ph.D. thesis defense yesterday. :) I am testing the RPM packaging now. The requirement for automake, and doxygen now requires me to upgrade these packages. I will let you guys know when I get it through. Later. Liguo Luigi Ballabio wrote: > > Hi all, > I just uploaded tentative tarballs for release 0.3.5 into > http://quantlib.org/gm/ > Please play with them if your computer has a few spare cycles. > > Dirk and Liguo: the final tarballs will come later, but can you check > that your Debian/RPM thing works correctly? > > Thanks, > Luigi > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Quantlib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@fa...> - 2004-03-17 16:06:32
|
On 2004.03.16 18:38, Liguo Song wrote: > Sorry to be less responsive recently. I just finished my Ph.D. thesis > defense yesterday. :) Great! How did it go? What was the subject? > I am testing the RPM packaging now. The requirement for automake, and > doxygen now requires me to upgrade these packages. I will let you > guys know when I get it through. Automake? You shouldn't need it to build from the distribution... Later, Luigi |
|
From: Liguo S. <lig...@va...> - 2004-03-17 21:45:09
Attachments:
QuantLib.spec
|
Here comes the spec file for QuantLib, which removed the wrong building requirement. I am not able to check it into the CVS as the CVS tree is not setup properly on my box right now. :( Thanks for Luigi to point it out for me. :) Let me know if anyone has problem building or installing the rpm package. Liguo Luigi Ballabio wrote: > On 2004.03.16 18:38, Liguo Song wrote: > >> Sorry to be less responsive recently. I just finished my Ph.D. >> thesis defense yesterday. :) > > > Great! How did it go? What was the subject? > > >> I am testing the RPM packaging now. The requirement for automake, >> and doxygen now requires me to upgrade these packages. I will let >> you guys know when I get it through. > > > Automake? You shouldn't need it to build from the distribution... > > Later, > Luigi > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Quantlib-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
