quantlib-dev

[Quantlib-dev] unit test

[henaffp <pat...@ke...>]

Hello,

I can build and run the entire test suite
/usr/local/bin/quantlib-test-suite

I'm now trying to run a single unit test with
/usr/local/bin/quantlib-test-suite --run_test=xxx

What should xxx look like? If I take the example of the Quotetest suite
(quotes.cpp), I see that
the suite is named "Quote tests"

but 
/usr/local/bin/quantlib-test-suite --run_test="Quotes tests"
does not work, nor many variations on that theme.

Could anyone indicate how to do this?

Thanks in advance

Patrick Hénaff
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/unit-test-tp29301875p29301875.html
Sent from the quantlib-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Quantlib-dev] unit test

[Kim K. T. <kue...@vo...>]

Hi Patrick,

henaffp schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I can build and run the entire test suite
> /usr/local/bin/quantlib-test-suite
>
> I'm now trying to run a single unit test with
> /usr/local/bin/quantlib-test-suite --run_test=xxx
>   

test cases in quantlib are registered using free functions instead of 
arguments. So i am afraid that this is not possible.
Take a look at test-suite\utilities.hpp on line 63. It uses 
BOOST_TEST_CASE instead of BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE. A workaround would be u 
just comment the tests out in file quantlibtestsuite.hpp that you dont 
want to run.

HTH
-Kim

> What should xxx look like? If I take the example of the Quotetest suite
> (quotes.cpp), I see that
> the suite is named "Quote tests"
>
> but 
> /usr/local/bin/quantlib-test-suite --run_test="Quotes tests"
> does not work, nor many variations on that theme.
>
> Could anyone indicate how to do this?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Patrick Hénaff
>   

Re: [Quantlib-dev] unit test

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 22:50 +0200, Kim Kuen Tang wrote:
> test cases in quantlib are registered using free functions instead of 
> arguments. So i am afraid that this is not possible.
> Take a look at test-suite\utilities.hpp on line 63. It uses 
> BOOST_TEST_CASE instead of BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE. A workaround would be u 
> just comment the tests out in file quantlibtestsuite.hpp that you dont 
> want to run.

Kim,
	it's been a while since I've looked at the Boost unit-test framework,
so I'm not familiar with the most recent stuff.  Would you suggest
switching to BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE?  If so, would you consider writing a
patch to do that?

Luigi


-- 

I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you 
looked at it in the right way, did not become still more complicated. 
-- Poul Anderson 

Re: [Quantlib-dev] unit test

[Kim K. T. <kue...@vo...>]

Hi Luigi,

Luigi Ballabio schrieb:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 22:50 +0200, Kim Kuen Tang wrote:
>   
> Kim,
> 	it's been a while since I've looked at the Boost unit-test framework,
> so I'm not familiar with the most recent stuff.  Would you suggest
> switching to BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE?  
to be honest, i wont suggest to move to the run-by-name version even the 
change is straightforward.
The extra feature that you will gain seems not worth the effort.
Or i didnt need this feature in the past. That is why i am not motivated.

What is your opinion?

Kim
> If so, would you consider writing a
> patch to do that?
>
> Luigi
>
>
>   

Re: [Quantlib-dev] unit test

[Luigi B. <lui...@gm...>]

On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:04 +0200, Kim Kuen Tang wrote:
> Luigi Ballabio schrieb:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 22:50 +0200, Kim Kuen Tang wrote:
> >   
> > Kim,
> > 	it's been a while since I've looked at the Boost unit-test framework,
> > so I'm not familiar with the most recent stuff.  Would you suggest
> > switching to BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE?  
> to be honest, i wont suggest to move to the run-by-name version even the 
> change is straightforward.
> The extra feature that you will gain seems not worth the effort.

Ok, thanks.

Luigi


-- 

Anyone who says he can see through women is missing a lot. 
-- Groucho Marx