Hi Luigi,=20
=20
> sounds good. Just don't do it right now since we're trying to =20
> freeze the library to branch out a release. As soon as the branch is ma=
de =20
> you can start working on it as far as I'm concerned.=20
Sure. Do you need any help for the release? I'm available until next=20
Friday (start of my long due holidays...).=20
=20
> >We could then also use History<Rate> in the XiborManager class and thu=
s use=20
> >a custom Rate class to represent interest rates.=20
> Do you mean that Rate is not satisfactory as a typedef to double? In wh=
ich=20
> way? (and Nando, I don't want to hear about positive constraints right=20
> now)=20
Ok, I should have said "and thus be able to use a custom Rate class if=20
needed". For me, double is fine, but I think it's nicer to enforce the us=
e of=20
the Rate type in these cases.
Sad
|
