|
From: Michael (D. portal) <mi...@da...> - 2021-08-31 14:08:55
|
Hi Giuseppe: Thanks a lot for your very insightful reply! I will do B-S (Breeden-Litzenberger) implied probabilities first to see if the results make sense before going to more sophisticated modelling. This is great, thank you! Michael On Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 3:27 AM Giuseppe Trapani <tr...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > apologies but I'm not getting your point: the result is valid for whatever > underlying (be it interest rates / stocks / commodities) and so on, it only > relies on option prices. You can compute those option prices with a model > or you can get them from the market and THEN you obtain the risk-neutral > density for the underlying. > > As for the SABR being "specific for rates" I think it's a slight > misconception: the SABR model describes the dynamics of the underlying > under the forward measure so you can use it with whatever underlying. It > became sort of "standard" in IR markets since it's a very simple way to > improve the computation of hedging ratios: when pricing vanilla derivatives > in the Black-76 (or Bachelier) framework you can use it to parametrize the > volatility curve and compute smile-coherent greeks. Such a framework is the > most intuitive since it allows you to price the most common and liquid > derivatives (Swaptions and Caps/Floors) without the need to model > dependencies between the knots of the yield curve. > > If instead you are interested more specifically in the dynamics of the > ENTIRE yield curve, you have to rely on term-structure models (for example > short-rate models or maybe more involved quasi-gaussian models accounting > for the skew or more modern markov-functional models). You work in a > Monte-Carlo fashion like this: > > 1) calibrate the parameters of the model to some "information carrying > derivatives" > 2) simulate the yield curve at the horizon you need > 3) compute whatever you are interested in (for example the 10y swap fair > rate) on that curve > 4) aggregate all the simulation results > > Now as for 1) term-structure models are typically low-dimensional so you > cannot "calibrate" to all the IR market derivatives. A common choice is a > set of coterminal swaptions or ATM caps/floors spanning the analysis > horizon. Also depending on the model, 2) and 3) can have some analytic > formulas / approximations so maybe you can spare yourself the whole > simulation and compute directly what you need. > > > > > Il giorno mar 31 ago 2021 alle ore 03:18 Michael (DataDriven portal) < > mi...@da...> ha scritto: > >> Thanks a lot! >> >> I see links like below Breeden-Litzenberger >> >> >> https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/29524/breeden-litzenberger-formula-for-risk-neutral-densities >> >> This is very useful for B-S distributional assumptions and will work well >> for stocks. I am not sure if it will produce good results for interest >> rates which have different distributions (e.g. rates now are so low that >> are less likely to decrease than increase). But I will definitely give it a >> try. Another way to do this is to use SABR volatility model (which is >> specific for rates) but I am not sure if a simple solution exists to derive >> probabilities there. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:36 AM Giuseppe Trapani <tr...@gm...> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> to add on the previous answer, the derivative is taken with respect to >>> the strike price of the option. >>> >>> It's pretty easy to derive by yourself starting from the general payoff >>> of an option (yielding a "model free result") or from the Black-76 formula. >>> >>> For extra directions check online "Breeden-Litzenberger result". >>> >>> Giuseppe Trapani >>> >>> Il lun 30 ago 2021, 15:28 Michael (DataDriven portal) < >>> mi...@da...> ha scritto: >>> >>>> Yes. Thanks! If you could point me in the right direction on where I >>>> can get code for this that would be great. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021, 8:47 AM Gorazd Brumen <gor...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> There is a well known formula that relates call/put prices to implied >>>>> pricing probabilities, related to the second derivative of the >>>>> call/put prices. You might need an implied option value >>>>> parametrization for that. >>>>> Regards, >>>>> G >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 5:56 PM Michael (DataDriven portal) >>>>> <mi...@da...> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi All, >>>>> > >>>>> > I am looking for an algo to calculate option-market-implied >>>>> probabilities of interest rates moves derived from the premiums of interest >>>>> rate swaptions. >>>>> > >>>>> > E.g. market-implied probabilities from the prices of swaptions on >>>>> 10-year-swap rates. What is the market-implied probability that 10Y swap >>>>> rate will increase 25, 50, 75 bps, etc? >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > >>>>> > Michael >>>>> > >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > QuantLib-users mailing list >>>>> > Qua...@li... >>>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> QuantLib-users mailing list >>>> Qua...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users >>>> >>> > > -- > > *Giuseppe Trapani* > |