Re: [Quake-devel] cheating

[Joseph C. <kng...@de...>]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:55:37AM +1000, Peter Donald wrote:
> >Well they stay seperate, but they have said that they'd like to work with
> >us in collaboration and have mentioned using our engine (though I haven't
> >checked to verify this). I think the reason we haven't really heard from
> >them much in the way of collaboration is that our website on sourceforge is
> >too lagged in australia where qwf is run.
> 
> Web sites fine and they run their server about 20km from where I am ... the
> problem is probably more that this is probably too dynamic a process for
> them when alll they want to do is have a secure client. It would require a
> lot of work to keep up with changes and make sure everything stays stable
> all the time :P

That's why we have stable releases.  =>

Pretty much everyone's saying the same thing.  We're really breaking
things too much because of the in-progress merge to be useful to those not
working on it until we're done.

We will hopefully get done soon.

-- 
Joseph Carter <kng...@de...>               GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/)         20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/)   44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3

== Signoff: Beregond (Klingon function calls do not have 'parameters' --
   they have 'arguments' -- and they ALWAYS WIN THEM.) at 02:00PM