|
From: Steve L. <sw...@ca...> - 2008-04-11 15:20:23
|
Ken, Sorry to be a bit slow getting back - not sure which repository you've been using to get the jar file. Is it through a Google code project? I'm forwarding this reply to another list to see if I can flush out the owners of the files. Steve Hamilton, Kenneth wrote: > Hello. > > I have been attempting to develop some code to > import QTI code into an existing assessment > system. In this effort, I have been using > the jar qti_v2p1_jaxb.jar, as I understood this > to be available for such use under an open > source (BSD) license. The version that I have > been using has class files dated March 10, 2008, > and has imsqti_v2p1 as its root package. It > appears to work fine for my needs. > > Now I cannot find this version of the jar on > the QTI development site. It has apparently been > replaced with a new jar > > qti_v2p1_jaxb_no_mathml_no_xinclude.jar > > with a different package structure. > > I would like to continue to use the version I have, > and not have to rewrite code. > > Typically we get versioned jars via maven, and > I have the March 10 version of your jar in our > local repository. It would be preferable to point > to a stable reference version that could be > downloaded by maven. > > I want to be sure that I am operating within the > bounds of your license as I understood it when I > copied this jar. I am planning to use it in an > upcoming release of a commercial product, and > I accept that it is "without warranty". > > I think it is very important for the adoption of QTI > to have reference versions of such fundamental > functionality freely available. > > Please let know if I have misunderstood the terms > of use. I am operating under a tight schedule and > need to know what I can rely upon. > > Thank you very much. > > Ken Hamilton > Principal Software Engineer > Follett Digital Resources > > > _______________________________________________ > IMS-QTI mailing list > IM...@li... > http://lists.ucles.org.uk/lists/listinfo/ims-qti |