qtarch-users Mailing List for Qt Architect
Brought to you by:
jeffharris,
kebner
Menu
▾
▴
qtarch-users
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|
|
From: <Fra...@t-...> - 2000-07-25 10:04:31
|
If I develop a Dialog named : MyDialog the default names for the generated files shout be : mydialog.h mydialog.cpp mydialogdata.h mydialogdata.cpp If you have to develop SW for differned OS it seems to me it simplyfied the porting. Frank. Jeff Harris wrote: > > Are you referring to the dialogData.* files that it generates? The data > file names can be changed. In fact if you change the class name, the > file names will change automatically. > > Jeff |
|
From: <Fra...@t-...> - 2000-07-25 02:07:23
|
Hi Jeff, now it works. Now a question. What is the reason why qtarch generates filenames with great letters ? I thing it is better to generate only little letters. In fact I have change the Code to do it. Frank |
|
From: Jeff H. <ha...@co...> - 2000-07-25 01:33:43
|
Are you referring to the dialogData.* files that it generates? The data file names can be changed. In fact if you change the class name, the file names will change automatically. Jeff Frank Blau wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > now it works. > Now a question. > What is the reason why qtarch generates filenames with great letters ? > I thing it is better to generate only little letters. > In fact I have change the Code to do it. > > Frank |
|
From: Jeff H. <ha...@co...> - 2000-07-23 20:43:26
|
I did some checking into your problem of QObject::name crashing. As it turns out, we neglected to update modules to the new scheme of handling widgets in 2.1. I've just checked in a bunch of changes which should fix your problem. I've update the test module in qtarch to work. One thing you'll need to consider is the API changes that were made to DlgWidget in 2.1. I don't know if you've modified your widgets yet, but there were some fairly large changes. Most changes were due to the new saving mechanism, XML. Let me know if these changes don't work for you. Jeff Jeff Harris wrote: > Yea, the -rdynamic flag was removed in 2.1. It was an oversight when > were were invesigating some memory problems. > > Do you have a stack trace or core file for the QObject::name crash? Are > you linking your library with -fPIC? > > Jeff > > Frank Blau wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have a look to the Makefile.common and find that the switch > > -rdynamic was not set. > > With this switch the modul is loaded, but the program chrashes in > > the Methode QObject::name(). The same result when linking direkt the > > Object from ../../widget. > > > > Any Idea ? > > > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qtarch-users mailing list > > Qta...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/qtarch-users > > _______________________________________________ > Qtarch-users mailing list > Qta...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/qtarch-users |
|
From: Jeff H. <ha...@co...> - 2000-07-23 17:44:26
|
Yea, the -rdynamic flag was removed in 2.1. It was an oversight when were were invesigating some memory problems. Do you have a stack trace or core file for the QObject::name crash? Are you linking your library with -fPIC? Jeff Frank Blau wrote: > Hi, > I have a look to the Makefile.common and find that the switch > -rdynamic was not set. > With this switch the modul is loaded, but the program chrashes in > the Methode QObject::name(). The same result when linking direkt the > Object from ../../widget. > > Any Idea ? > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > Qtarch-users mailing list > Qta...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/qtarch-users |
|
From: <Fra...@t-...> - 2000-07-23 08:45:06
|
Hi, I have a look to the Makefile.common and find that the switch -rdynamic was not set. With this switch the modul is loaded, but the program chrashes in the Methode QObject::name(). The same result when linking direkt the Object from ../../widget. Any Idea ? Frank |
|
From: Jeff H. <ha...@co...> - 2000-07-21 23:01:21
|
Wow, someone is actually using this list. You've got the first posting. Anyways, the symbol it's trying to find is from the DlgWidget.moc.o file. Are you linking your shared library with DlgWidget.o? If so, then try adding the .moc.o file as well. I don't know why it broke in 2.1. The symbol is still there. Jeff Frank Blau wrote: > Hi, > i have write a module for qtarch. It works with 1.44 and 2.0 but since > 2.1 it will not work. > This message appers : > Failed to load module /home/dev/src/qtarch-2.1/module/bde/BDEModule.so: > /home/dev/src/qtarch-2.1/module/bde/BDEModule.so: undefined symbol: > metaObject__C9DlgWidget > > Who can help ? > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > Qtarch-users mailing list > Qta...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/qtarch-users |
|
From: <Fra...@t-...> - 2000-07-21 10:32:08
|
Hi, i have write a module for qtarch. It works with 1.44 and 2.0 but since 2.1 it will not work. This message appers : Failed to load module /home/dev/src/qtarch-2.1/module/bde/BDEModule.so: /home/dev/src/qtarch-2.1/module/bde/BDEModule.so: undefined symbol: metaObject__C9DlgWidget Who can help ? Frank |
|
From: Jeff H. <ha...@co...> - 2000-07-03 21:14:26
|
Just a test |
