From: Steven H. <ki...@mu...> - 2004-11-23 18:37:13
|
Hmm not had to download said tools for building anything else and I build almost all things from source which makes me question how standard it is? Not sure how helpful it is not being able to compile from CVS without installing additional tools especially as there is no mention of it in the docs Also just installed autoconf and it still fails: ./autogen.sh + which autoreconf + autoreconf -i Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at /usr/local/share/autoconf/Autom4te/General.pm line 459. autoreconf: aclocal failed with exit status: 16777215 pkg_info |grep autoc autoconf-2.53_1 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms Seems like a bit to much pain to ask people to go through just to compile the CVS version when a 10 line Makefile did the job nicely. Steve / K ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ludwig Nussel" <l-...@us...> > > automake/autoconf are standard GNU development tools and they are > probably just as annoying as useful sometimes. The reasons I want it > for are at least, make dist, make distcheck, the standard install > target and the automatic dependency rules it generates. When I asked > last month the only concern was that it may not work on Windows, > therefore I added a simple Makefile.w32 for that. Note that you do > not need automake or autoconf if you compile the released version. > Only the CVS doesn't contain configure etc since those files are > automatically generated. ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to pos...@mu.... |