Re: [Qscada-developers] Hi all

[wireless <wir...@ta...>]

Jovan Kostovski wrote:
> On 3/17/07, Reza Azizi <azi...@gm...> wrote:
>> Hi
> 
> 
> Hi Reza,
> 
> Welcome on board ;)
> 
> 
>> i am a software engineer that work on monitoring an control software for
>> many years.
>> i found your project interesting, and if it is possible, i want to help you
>> on it.
> 
> Every helping hand is welcomed
> 
>> i can help you on analyze and design of it base on Object Oriented concept.
>> also i do a distributed data collecting project design base on MySql, java
>> (j2ee) and Ajax
>> that consist of tree part, 1.Data access  2.Storage 3.User interface .
>> i think here you need more complex one, i can work on it.
> 
> Great. We have web interface in mind based on Ajax. Currently we are
> focused on the architectural design and I'm planing to start writing
> some demo app and basic modules.
> If you want you can start with thinking of some basic concept
> for the web client based on Ajax, or just tell us what's close ti
> your heart and you can help on that topic
> 
>> i do not find any thing about IEC 61850 in your project and if you know,
>> it is a standard protocol for many new relay in SCADA.
>> how about it?
> 
> Right. We didn't write anything about IEC 61850.
> I'm currently writing and implementation of IEC 61850,
> it's a protocol for transformer substation automation
> basicly, so that's why I didn't say a word.
> 
> But I think we should include it at later stage
> when we have something working.

grouper.ieee.org/groups/1525/Meetings/Louisville99/AnnexH_P1525HD1r12.doc
-

>From this doc we read:
"IEC 61850 defines functions representing the interface of the
substation automation system to the local station operator HMI (human
machine interface), to a remote control center, or to the remote
engineering for monitoring and maintenance. As shown in Figure H-1,
these functions communicate via the logical interfaces 1 and 6 and via
the logical interface 7 and the remote control interface to the
outside world."

Since it is a specialty application of what a robust SCADA system can
do, it needs to be included as an application or specialty niche.
It is not central to a SCADA system except the IEC 61850 standard
needs to be compatible (like many other standards) for
interoperability with QSCADA.  So, I agree with Jovan's assessment.


That said, it's inclusion does look like a good idea. We need to keep
the architectural organization of documents is a structure where only
the key technologies are  in the root documents and special sections
for all sorts of interoperability added in the appropriate sections.


Also, for the record, I have support use of JAVA with QT in this project.


> 
> The best thing about FOSS is that you just share the
> idea and some basic code, then the others that find
> your idea interesting are contributing.
> The code is not mine but our ;)
> 
> GREETZ, Jovan

YES!

James


> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Qscada-developers mailing list
> Qsc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qscada-developers
>