Re: [qmc2-devel] QMC2
Brought to you by:
prianthefist,
renereucher
From: Miodrag M. <mm...@gm...> - 2011-04-08 13:11:36
|
Hi, Thank you on your answer. Yes think we should keep sysinfo.dat. Thing is that it should be expanded and we will see to update wiki accordingly so there is more info, specially for little known systems. My idea is that we concentrate more on documenation and real emulation, so that is why I intialy asked for QMC team support Anyway we plan to remove that WINUI thing as soon as there is full support for softlists from your side. Etabeta will check last build during weekend and inform you about findings. Hopefully we can make both projects more popular. Regards, Micko On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:04 PM, R. Reucher <ren...@ba...>wrote: > On Friday 08 April 2011 14:43:23 R. Reucher wrote: > > Also, as I've proposed to etabeta78 a few month ago, I'm going to add a > > "MESS- wiki-2-sysinfo.dat importer" to QMC2 in one of the next versions, > > because the current export routine from Duke is apparently not "clean". > > When that's working and officially accepted (by the MESS team), I'd love > > to take over the responsibility for generating up-to-date sysinfo.dat's. > > Either published on my homepage and/or as part of the SVN trunk (as it is > > now). Everyone using QMC2 could also generate / import it on-demand... > Reconsidering this... if sysinfo.dat isn't a "strategic feature" of the > MESS > team, I could as well just add a browser based sysinfo look-up (querying > the > wiki directly), similar to the MAWS look-up feature for MAME. But that > alone > wouldn't allow for "offline-reading"... well, the same holds for the MAWS > look-up, but it's cached for a day. > > So, there's my first front-end realted question: is it even planned to keep > sysinfo.dat in the future? > > Thanks, René > -- > René Reucher > ren...@ba... > http://www.batcom-it.net/ > > A fool's brain digests philosophy into folly, science into > superstition, and art into pedantry. Hence University education. > -- G. B. Shaw > |