[q-lang-users] Infixed Ternary Operators?

[Rob H. <hub...@gm...>]

Dear Albert,

I think the answer to this question will be "no", but I thought I'd ask 
it anyway (just in case).

It is possible to define a ternary infix operator? For example, suppose 
the operator is called f, and takes three arguments
    public f P X Y;

I'd like to write
    X (f 13) Y
rather than
    f 13 X Y

In other words, I'd like the partial application
    f 13
to yield a ('specialised') infix operator.

If it can't be done, then I don't consider it important enough (or even 
necessarily desirable) to implement. I just wondered whether there might 
be some kind of Q trick I'd not thought of.

Thanks,
Rob.