Re: [q-lang-users] more features in Q

[christophe m. g. de l. <chr...@gm...>]

hi list,

i'd have to second that opinion. i am most interested in Q, but am now (when
i have the time)
learning erlang and haskell because there is more basic material on those
languages available,
just so that i can eventually come back to Q. (although those languages are
also quite interesting).

i have done some scheme programming which eases the learning curve, but
these languages
are still so different from anything else that i have programmed in that the
Q docs are too dense
for me. i think an important guideline should be, not just saying that you
can do X in Q,
but elaborating as to why and how you would use (and not use!) feature X.

anyway, thanks for the language, and also for the warm welcome i got with my
first post, now
many weeks ago, to which i never responded. hope to come back to Q soon.

best regards,
_c



> In terms of features for the Q language, what would be
> very good would be "better" documentation.
>
>