Re: [q-lang-users] Two proposed improvements to Q
Brought to you by:
agraef
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [q-lang-users] Two proposed improvements to Q
|
From: <ed...@ri...> - 2007-07-01 12:49:19
|
<html>=0D I have a bunch of different types of scripts but they mostly operate on fil= es, so it doesn't make any difference to me. However, if I were ever to cha= nge my CGI scripting language on our intranet server to Q, I'd po= sitively want the slim version.<BR> =0D <P style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER= -LEFT: #f5f5f5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT color=3Dred>> What do= es everybody else think about this? Are you all running little Q</FONT><BR> <FONT color=3Dred>> scripts in tight loops from the shell, or do you rat= her use them</FONT><BR> <FONT color=3Dred>> interactively? I.e., how do you want your prelude: "= slim" or "fat"? :)</FONT><BR> </P>=0D <P style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER= -LEFT: #f5f5f5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">Eddie</P>=0D </html><BR>= |
