Re: [q-lang-users] New stuff in cvs: multichar ops, views
Brought to you by:
agraef
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [q-lang-users] New stuff in cvs: multichar ops, views
|
From: Albert G. <Dr....@t-...> - 2007-06-29 19:46:43
|
Rob Hubbard wrote: > Okay, (+:) at the precedence of (+) it is then. Ok, I'm happy that we agree on this now. A precedence system is almost always a compromise, and I agree that Q's is not perfect either. Actually I've mostly adopted it from Pascal, because I just can't remember the precedence of all C operators for more than five minutes. ;-) Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu... WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag |
