Re: [q-lang-users] New stuff in cvs: multichar ops, views

[Rob H. <hub...@gm...>]

Hello Albert,

On 29/06/07, Albert Graef <Dr....@t-...> wrote:
> But let's assume, just for fun, that X+:Y really is atomic, how should
> foo 2 +: 3 be parsed? Or -2+:3 ? I think that it would be rather
> surprising if -2+:3 returned (-2)+:(-3). Note the parentheses; these
> would be obligatory if (+:) had, say, the same precedence as (.).

Ah, yes.
That's a good point.

Okay, (+:) at the precedence of (+) it is then.

Thanks,
Rob.