Re: [q-lang-users] New stuff in cvs: multichar ops, views

[Keith T. <kaz...@ea...>]

 
--- Albert Graef <Dr....@t-...> writes:
- ...'X+:Y' should be seen as an abbreviation for 'X+i*Y'...
- 
- Why should we arbitrarily limit the scope of Q's '+:'
- when it can be applied to complex operands just as easily?

Okay. I understand you *much* better now, and will abandon my objection.

However, is there an explanation, implementation note, or a warning that should be added to the manual so that programmers (from all backgrounds) can be confident when using '+:' (i.e., prevent unexpected math errors)?

Cheers,
Keith