Re: [q-lang-users] New stuff in cvs: multichar ops, views

[Keith T. <kaz...@ea...>]

 
--- John Cowan <co...@cc...> scripsit:
- What about "+*", then? The colon is only relevant because of
- a rule of Haskell lexical syntax that does not apply to Q.

Then why not '+i' (as in X+iY)? I understand about the colon; can the Q interpreter parse '+i' as intended?

In any event, Albert has already implemented '+:'. =)

Cheers,
Keith