Re: [q-lang-users] [qlist] SDL anyone?

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Andrew Berg wrote:
> I don't know what the copyright is on their tutorial
> (http://www.swig.org/tutorial.html) but just copying that and replacing
> all their 'Building a XXX Module' sections with a single 'Building a q
> module' would fit reasonably well in qdoc.  At least it would not take a
> lot of time to write.  ;^)

Well, in that case it also shouldn't be too difficult to just get along
with the standard SWIG documentation. ;-)

Actually, the right way to go ahead with the SWIG support would be to
make the Q language plugin work with the latest SWIG and get everything
into the official package. Quite a lot of work, though, and SWIG is
still very much a moving target right now, so this will have to wait
until it stabilizes.

Cheers, and a happy new year,
Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag