Re: [q-lang-users] [qlist] SDL anyone?

[Andrew B. <and...@ya...>]

On 27 Dec 2006, at 08:39, Albert Graef wrote:

> That would be great! :) Meanwhile I'm tempted to take another shot  
> at a
> decent GUI interface. A direct Qt wrapper for Q would be quite useful.

Being a Mac bigot--oh, I mean enthusiast--I have (waay down on my  
list of priorities) the idea to do a Obj-C bridge to q.  I think this  
would be groovy, because it would give all the Cocoa UI classes, and  
q is on the short list of languages where they syntax could be  
mangled to the point that the Obj-C/Smalltalk syntax for message  
sends could be preserved.  It's really a shame about the ":"  
character not being allowed in identifiers...  I'll have to campaign  
for that at some point.  :)

-a