Re: [q-lang-users] Just starting with Q

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Burton Samograd wrote:
> I know about SC, but for some reason I've avoided it since I found it
> years ago, probably because I found the sytax very non-familiar at the
> time.

Yes, SC-Lang needs some time to get used to it, but it has such a great 
realtime sound+synth engine underneath. Good sound, and very low 
latency. That's what I mostly use, and it can be controlled quite 
conveniently from Q via OSC. I also started thinking about a Q API for 
the synth definitions. When that is finished, together with the 
sequencer interface I'm working on, then you will be able to just use Q 
as the SC language client instead of SC-Lang.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag