Re: [q-lang-users] The implicit operator in Q

[Keith T. <kaz...@ea...>]

--- Albert Graef writes:
- Maybe the constraint should actually be "the (entire) lhs must
- not be a const", so that constructor equations like [1,2,3] = []
- are still forbidden, but not applications involving a const in the
- head like [X|Xs] Y = ...?
- 
- [snip!]
- 
- I actually like this idea.

Me too.

- This also gives you a bigger gun to shoot yourself in the foot...

If it is a _well-documented_ gun, then it should not be a problem.

Cheers,
Keith