Re: [q-lang-users] Q 7.2 RC1 Issue 2: Notation

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Rob Hubbard wrote:
> I've been persuaded of some benefits of (%); so I suppose I'm leaning
> if favour of (%) over (over) -- pun not intended. I'm now happy for
> (%) to be used.

Great. :) I'll do the necessary changes after I've finished fixing the 
INF/NaN support (or rather getting rid of the code which prevents it). I 
guess I'll be ready to release RC2 before the weekend...

> It looks like (%) wins to me, which is a big factor; the remainder of
> us have been persuaded; we are no longer divided. Groan -- sorry.

I'd have to reply with poetry, but inadequate is my English; happy I am 
we reached a consensus; no longer divided we are.

Tim, it's your turn now. How about some habbie stanza? :)

Cheers!
Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag