Re: [q-lang-users] Improper tuples and user-defined operators

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

John Cowan wrote:
> Another point: it would be useful to me to have a qint.h function that
> reports which symbols are operators and which are not, so that when the
> Scheme user writes "(q-call over 1 2)" I can pass the symbol "(over)"
> rather than "over" to the qmkapp() function.  Probably the Right Thing
> is to return the precedence level, for the benefit of someone trying
> to reconstruct the infix representation, or 0 if the symbol is not
> an operator.

Ok, I've put that on my TODO list for 7.2 final.

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag