Re: [q-lang-users] RFC: Conditional syntax
Brought to you by:
agraef
From: John C. <co...@cc...> - 2006-05-31 14:15:13
|
Albert Graef scripsit: > - The lambda function used to return combinator terms which weren't nice > to look at, but could be unparsed, written to a file and read back. With > the new built-in lambda function, you'll get an external <<Function>> > object instead. For this reason, and also for the sheer coolness of it, I'd like to see the old lambda stay in the standard library, but renamed "Lambda". It's a nice executable demonstration of exactly how lambdas can be expressed as combinators. (It would be all right if, like graphics.q, the modified lambda.q were not loaded by default.) -- John Cowan co...@cc... http://ccil.org/~cowan Original line from The Warrior's Apprentice by Lois McMaster Bujold: "Only on Barrayar would pulling a loaded needler start a stampede toward one." English-to-Russian-to-English mangling thereof: "Only on Barrayar you risk to lose support instead of finding it when you threat with the charged weapon." |