Re: [q-lang-users] Q as a 2Lisp

[Keith T. <kaz...@ea...>]

John Cowan wrote:
>I don't know.  Most of the book is in fact about 2Lisp; only the last chapter or so covers 3Lisp, and it was less interesting to me. 

Fair enough. If 3Lisp was more of a 2Lisp++, then "Q as a 2Lisp" makes more sense to me, too. Thank you for starting this thread; I enjoy tangential (oblique?) learning opportunities!

Cheers,
Keith