Re: [q-lang-users] Matching with special constructors

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

John Cowan wrote:
> I wonder whether it would be useful to have a way of declaring precisely
> which special constructors (or special forms in general?) are affected
> by this.  Maybe not.

I also thought about something similar, but decided against it since it 
would be rather confusing. If some function really needs to ensure that 
one of its args is passed unevaluated then you can always declare it as 
a special form.

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag